GPT-6 Sol is a reasoning model in the OpenAI GPT-6 series that balances complex task capabilities with efficiency for sustained use, with a focus on code modifications, professional analysis, and tool collaboration. It supports text and image understanding and is suitable for repeatedly advancing tasks involving requirements, code, logs, and screenshots. Compared with GPT-5.6 Sol, it emphasizes improvements in programming quality, factual reliability, and technical communication; for the most difficult end-to-end projects, consider GPT-6 Astra.
Point the Base URL to api.acedata.cloud, configure your platform API key and the model ID below, and use your compatible SDK or client.
import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key=os.environ["ACEDATACLOUD_API_KEY"],
base_url="https://api.acedata.cloud/v1",
)
response = client.responses.create(
model="gpt-6-sol",
input="Hello!",
)
print(response.output_text)Choose an available protocol for this model. OpenAI SDK uses a Base URL ending in /v1; Anthropic SDK uses the root URL. See each guide for protocol-specific parameters, tools and response formats.
Clarify capacity, input and output, and invocation methods before choosing a model.
GPT-6 Sol's reasoning and vision are model capabilities. Chat Completions and Responses handle history, output, and tool formats separately; the application is responsible for message organization and actual execution.
Learn what gpt-6-sol can bring to your work.
GPT-6 Sol's programming strengths go beyond completing functions; it is better suited to analyzing modification plans in conjunction with requirements, related files, and failing tests. OpenAI's coding evaluations also consider correctness, test quality, scope control, and code style. In practice, you can ask it to deliver minimal patches, regression test recommendations, and impact notes to facilitate engineering team review.
For business rule organization, technical solution comparisons, and document Q&A, GPT-6 Sol emphasizes factual reliability. It is well suited to organizing provided materials into conclusions, evidence, and items requiring confirmation, rather than merely producing a fluent summary. Submitting original records together with clear questions helps produce reports centered on verifiable information and makes it easier to identify contradictions between materials.
GPT-6 Sol continues the clearer communication style of the GPT-6 series, reducing unnecessary terminology, repetition, and implementation minutiae. For debugging or design tasks, you can ask it to explain its assessment first, then list modifications and verification status. This kind of delivery is better suited to code review and team discussion, but real logs and test results should still be used to determine whether the task is complete.
Start with specific tasks to find where the model can be effective.
Provide the refactoring goal, relevant code, error stack traces, and failing tests, and let GPT-6 Sol analyze possible root causes and propose targeted fixes. Deliverables can include a patch draft, regression tests that need to be added, and compatibility notes. If connected to testing tools, you can feed the results back in so subsequent changes focus on actual failure points rather than repeatedly rewriting the entire module.
Submit interface screenshots, interaction requirements, and component code together, and ask GPT-6 Sol to identify layout differences, interaction gaps, and implementation recommendations against the specifications. Combined image and text input is suitable for connecting visual observations with technical context, and the output can be an issue list and modification plan. Screenshot analysis itself does not operate the browser; actual clicking and verification require an execution environment.
When using Chat Completions, place relevant history in messages; when using Responses, organize input and related conversation content according to the documentation. In each round, provide the latest materials, modification goals, and key constraints; for longer tasks, retain interim summaries and a final version that can be reviewed independently.
Choose based on task complexity, input materials, and expected results.
When a task requires multi-step judgment, code iteration, and extended professional collaboration, but does not always need the highest capability in the series, GPT-6 Sol can be the preferred choice. OpenAI reserves Astra for the most difficult and important projects, while positioning Luna as a more efficient option. Use acceptance quality, rework frequency, and total usage from real tasks to decide, rather than treating test results under different reasoning settings as a universal ranking.
Compared with GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-6 Sol focuses on improvements in programming, factuality, and collaborative expression, making it suitable for comparative testing with existing bug-fix and reporting tasks. GPT-6.1 Sol is another version and should not be treated as an alias for gpt-6-sol. Existing clients can continue using familiar entry points, but during migration, check whether reasoning configuration, tool-result integration, and output parsing meet business acceptance requirements.
Based on the characteristics of gpt-6-sol, first validate a small task whose results can be checked.
You can ask directly: Based on the requirements and existing implementation, break down the modification steps, identify module dependencies and the acceptance method for each step. When information is missing, list the questions first, and do not describe the plan as already completed.
Provide relevant files, the runtime environment, and behaviors that must not change; record implementation, testing, and actual execution results separately.
Use the full model ID gpt-6-sol, first confirm the public request format and available parameters on the API page, then connect your application. Retain result parsing, exception handling, and relevant evidence, and use the same set of real samples to evaluate whether it is suitable for continued use.
Before formal use, understand output quality and capability boundaries.
Answers to common questions about using gpt-6-sol.
No. GPT-6 Sol uses gpt-6-sol, while GPT-6.1 Sol is a subsequent independent version. When selecting Sol, use the exact model value and do not mix the reasoning settings or access conditions of the two versions; when upgrading, compare output quality and workflow compatibility using the same tasks.
Use Chat Completions or Responses and provide the full model ID. Chat Completions uses messages and choices, while Responses uses input and the corresponding response structure; handle history management, streaming events, and tool parameters separately for the selected API, without mixing the two formats.
It can use image and text input to understand screenshots and provide modification suggestions based on code or requirements. Chat Completions can combine text and image_url in message content. When submitting, specify the areas of interest and expected deliverables; analyzing screenshots does not automatically click the interface or directly generate modified images.
Chat Completions uses reasoning_effort, while Responses uses the reasoning object. Start with a moderate setting, then adjust the intensity for complex debugging or solution comparisons, together with the output budget. Higher intensity does not guarantee correctness; it should still be evaluated based on testing, completeness of evidence, and actual acceptance results.
The model can propose code changes and participate in tool collaboration, but actually writing files and running tests requires the appropriate tools and permissions. When only code text is submitted, the result is modification suggestions or a patch draft; after connecting an execution environment, feed the test output back and request that the final answer clearly distinguish between suggestions and completed actions.
Choose a development approach or application suited to this model and follow its setup guide.
↗OpenAI Chat Completions API
SDK installation, authentication and examples↗OpenAI Responses API
SDK installation, authentication and examples
↗Using Ace Data Cloud with Cherry Studio
Chat client setup · Base URL, API key and model
↗Using Ace Data Cloud with ChatBox
Chat client setup · Base URL, API key and modelInput
$0.40per 1M tokens
Official $2.00
Output
$2.00per 1M tokens
Official $10.00
You pay$13,584for 142,800 credits · $0.0951 / credits46% OFF
You're billed in credits. Pick a top-up tier to see its per-credit rate — the larger the top-up, the cheaper each credit.
This is only a basic call example. See the full docs for more parameters and advanced usage.
View Docs